Talk:RFID Doorlock - Revision history

Gcmalloc at 11:51, 5 June 2012

2012-06-05T11:51:28Z

2012-06-05T06:18:35Z

the uC crashed again

2012-06-03T20:05:39Z

‎new board: new section

2012-06-01T18:05:10Z

2012-06-01T17:02:13Z

2012-06-01T17:01:33Z

2012-06-01T15:36:51Z

2012-06-01T15:33:04Z

2012-06-01T15:27:31Z

2012-06-01T15:23:07Z

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 I'm locked out again... (not my fault this time) --[[User:Wertenbr|Wertenbr]] 08:18, 5 June 2012 (CEST)
 == new board ==
 There is a new way to open/close the space : http://foo.fixme.ch/trigger.html I will document this asap

@@ Line 22: / Line 22: @@
 Il faudra aussi un moyen simple de changer le status du hs et de twitter, de plus l'histoire des logs serait vraiment interessante, on y avait pensé à l'époque, mais ca s'est jamais fait. Je trouve l'idée d'avoir une board qui fait qu'une seule chose et qui le fait bien très très bonne. Mais il faut aussi prévoir de pouvoir facilement interfacer des utilitaires. Ne pourrait-on pas communiquer avec la board en série depuis foo par exemple ? En utilisant le cablage ethernet existant, ou en retirant des cables. --[[User:Rorist|Rorist]] 20:05, 1 June 2012 (CEST)
 == new board ==
 There is a new way to open/close the space : http://foo.fixme.ch/trigger.html I will document this asap

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 3 June 2012
Line 22:		Line 22:

	Il faudra aussi un moyen simple de changer le status du hs et de twitter, de plus l'histoire des logs serait vraiment interessante, on y avait pensé à l'époque, mais ca s'est jamais fait. Je trouve l'idée d'avoir une board qui fait qu'une seule chose et qui le fait bien très très bonne. Mais il faut aussi prévoir de pouvoir facilement interfacer des utilitaires. Ne pourrait-on pas communiquer avec la board en série depuis foo par exemple ? En utilisant le cablage ethernet existant, ou en retirant des cables. --[[User:Rorist\|Rorist]] 20:05, 1 June 2012 (CEST)		Il faudra aussi un moyen simple de changer le status du hs et de twitter, de plus l'histoire des logs serait vraiment interessante, on y avait pensé à l'époque, mais ca s'est jamais fait. Je trouve l'idée d'avoir une board qui fait qu'une seule chose et qui le fait bien très très bonne. Mais il faut aussi prévoir de pouvoir facilement interfacer des utilitaires. Ne pourrait-on pas communiquer avec la board en série depuis foo par exemple ? En utilisant le cablage ethernet existant, ou en retirant des cables. --[[User:Rorist\|Rorist]] 20:05, 1 June 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	== new board ==
		+
		+	There is a new way to open/close the space : http://foo.fixme.ch/trigger.html I will document this asap

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:05, 1 June 2012
Line 20:		Line 20:
	I'm totally up to it, and motivated to help. We can also change the door locking mechanism. The one we choose has too many looking part. I would really go for a locking system in the door frame, as it is more reliable.		I'm totally up to it, and motivated to help. We can also change the door locking mechanism. The one we choose has too many looking part. I would really go for a locking system in the door frame, as it is more reliable.
	[[User:gcmalloc\|gcmalloc]] Fri Jun 1 19:01:21 CEST 2012		[[User:gcmalloc\|gcmalloc]] Fri Jun 1 19:01:21 CEST 2012
		+
		+	Il faudra aussi un moyen simple de changer le status du hs et de twitter, de plus l'histoire des logs serait vraiment interessante, on y avait pensé à l'époque, mais ca s'est jamais fait. Je trouve l'idée d'avoir une board qui fait qu'une seule chose et qui le fait bien très très bonne. Mais il faut aussi prévoir de pouvoir facilement interfacer des utilitaires. Ne pourrait-on pas communiquer avec la board en série depuis foo par exemple ? En utilisant le cablage ethernet existant, ou en retirant des cables. --[[User:Rorist\|Rorist]] 20:05, 1 June 2012 (CEST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:02, 1 June 2012
Line 19:		Line 19:

	I'm totally up to it, and motivated to help. We can also change the door locking mechanism. The one we choose has too many looking part. I would really go for a locking system in the door frame, as it is more reliable.		I'm totally up to it, and motivated to help. We can also change the door locking mechanism. The one we choose has too many looking part. I would really go for a locking system in the door frame, as it is more reliable.
		+	[[User:gcmalloc\|gcmalloc]] Fri Jun 1 19:01:21 CEST 2012

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:01, 1 June 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Wait 1 minute after tweeting before using the RFID... --[[User:Wertenbr\|Wertenbr]] 17:33, 1 June 2012 (CEST)		Wait 1 minute after tweeting before using the RFID... --[[User:Wertenbr\|Wertenbr]] 17:33, 1 June 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	I'm totally up to it, and motivated to help. We can also change the door locking mechanism. The one we choose has too many looking part. I would really go for a locking system in the door frame, as it is more reliable.

@@ Line 5: / Line 5: @@
 * The doorlock requires attention, it's a really important part I think (if it fails someone unwanted could come in or someone could be locked outside)
 * The code has to be as simple and as clear as possible, it has to be bug free
 I can (would be happy to) work on the project a bit if nobody is wanting to do it. I have experience in programming Atmel uCs and intel 8051 uCs, know how to build a StripBoard circuit etc... I can also use LCDs screens or 7segs to display information. I have the components or uCs so basically it would be free (no $$$ spend) <br> Naturally it will come with all the documentation (made by me), I could also write the logs on a memory etc... (so every time someone opens the door it could be registered etc...)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:33, 1 June 2012
Line 15:		Line 15:
	The 1 minute thing? --[[User:Sasha\|Sasha]] 17:23, 1 June 2012		The 1 minute thing? --[[User:Sasha\|Sasha]] 17:23, 1 June 2012

−	~~Are you still around ? because someone can come with~~ the ~~key, but only if you're still there~~ --[[User:Wertenbr\|Wertenbr]] 17:27, 1 June 2012 (CEST)	+	Wait 1 minute after tweeting before using the RFID... --[[User:Wertenbr\|Wertenbr]] 17:33, 1 June 2012 (CEST)

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 * Program the uC with a failback mode (using watchdogs for instance)
 * The doorlock requires attention, it's a really important part I think (if it fails someone unwanted could come in or someone could be locked outside)
 I can (would be happy to) work on the project a bit if nobody is wanting to do it. I have experience in programming Atmel uCs and intel 8051 uCs, know how to build a StripBoard circuit etc... I can also use LCDs screens or 7segs to display information. I have the components or uCs so basically it would be free (no $$$ spend) <br> Naturally it will come with all the documentation (made by me), I could also write the logs on a memory etc... (so every time someone opens the door it could be registered etc...)
@@ Line 13: / Line 14: @@
 The 1 minute thing? --[[User:Sasha|Sasha]] 17:23, 1 June 2012

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 1 June 2012
Line 11:		Line 11:

	Sorry... I locked the door yesterday and completely forgot about the 1min thing (it was the first time I used the tweet function...) --[[User:Wertenbr\|Wertenbr]] 17:21, 1 June 2012 (CEST)		Sorry... I locked the door yesterday and completely forgot about the 1min thing (it was the first time I used the tweet function...) --[[User:Wertenbr\|Wertenbr]] 17:21, 1 June 2012 (CEST)
		+
		+	The 1 minute thing? --[[User:Sasha\|Sasha]] 17:23, 1 June 2012