Difference between revisions of "CodingNight1"

From Fixme.ch
Jump to: navigation, search
(added what i learnt at this night)
(Result)
Line 41: Line 41:
 
*** Summary: although we didn't produce any production ready code, we never the less came up with multiple proof of concepts
 
*** Summary: although we didn't produce any production ready code, we never the less came up with multiple proof of concepts
 
*** Success: ✓
 
*** Success: ✓
 +
** Rorist
 +
*** Python 3 library still hard to find, some changes are kind of tricky (strings/bytes)
 +
*** It's hard to incorporate everyone in the coding process with different level of programming (Oliv felt a little bit left over)
 +
*** We had very good ideas, but we should have limited our self to the basics
 +
*** ...

Revision as of 14:54, 11 February 2012

Projects Proposition

The proposed projects are:

  • Merge patches and release new version of wiki2beamer
  • Pastebin application like sprung but based on flask
  • Adding patch to xchat otr.
  • Soundcloud plugin for mpd, should similar to the lastFM plugin.
  • Android app:
    • Record time slept.
    • Ssh remote (multimedia key, slide remote)
    • read only for etherpad formats
    • LDAP search
  • little game:
    • little to no graphic at all (sound driven game, or touch driven game)
    • platform game with open source sprite

Goal

  • Create a minimal pastebin

Result

  • A pastebin app which has the following component
    • a [cabinet] database.
    • a api that can be easily adapted for quite any databases.
    • A webinterface using flask (python 2.7), and another using the http.server module
    • A very raw socket interface with direct access trough telnet.
  • We learnt alot about:
    • esc
      • Python3 -- How to target this platform, available libraries and frameworks
      • Crazy high-performance Japanese database applications
      • Raw socket programming
      • Web-frameworks programming
      • Group dynamics during a coding-night
      • Also, adding more french vocab to my arsenal
      • Summary: although we didn't produce any production ready code, we never the less came up with multiple proof of concepts
      • Success: ✓
    • Rorist
      • Python 3 library still hard to find, some changes are kind of tricky (strings/bytes)
      • It's hard to incorporate everyone in the coding process with different level of programming (Oliv felt a little bit left over)
      • We had very good ideas, but we should have limited our self to the basics
      • ...